Comments on: Zombies For Kerry

By: House of Payne International

House of Payne International — Mon, 01 Nov 2004 22:25:16 +0000

The final countdown
In thirty-six hours, the apocalypse. I’ll be in my specially prepared shack in the hills, going over my checklist. Hey, you can’t be too careful.

By: vincent

vincent — Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:49:44 +0000

“It is just a ban on federal funding of embryonic stem cell research.”

Thank you man. Can you now explain to yourself how forbidding federal funding will generally limit the scope, the legitimacy and the sharing of research’s results and raise prices of products for end-consumers.

I hope you understand that leaving stem cell research to the private sector is not the smartest move if you want to develop a technology for everyone. This is just another present to the medic-lobby.

By: James Ph.

James Ph. — Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:42:35 +0000

Bush did not and does not forbid stem cell research. Bush is the FIRST President to authorize funding for embryonic stem cell research. What he did do was ban federal dunding for future embryonic stem cell lines. Again, this is not a ban on stem cell research, and it is not a ban on embryonic stem cell research. It is just a ban on federal funding of embryonic stem cell research.

By: vincent

vincent — Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:56:50 +0000

Why “implicitely”? Is Bush not the one who forbid stem cell research?

By: James Ph.

James Ph. — Wed, 13 Oct 2004 05:13:29 +0000

Mark,

Noticed you chose Strom Thurmond as the Republican example. There were no others that came to mind?

I still think it is shameful to politicize someone’s deat, and implicitly blame Bush. That’s cheap.

By: Brain Shavings

Brain Shavings — Wed, 13 Oct 2004 05:03:13 +0000

Killing the weak to heal the sick
I’d heard just about enough of the blather about a supposed “ban” on stem cell research, but John Edwards’ speech about helping the crippled to walk through embryo stem cell research pushed me over the edge. In 2002 I published a Note (the term for…

By: Mark

Mark — Wed, 13 Oct 2004 04:20:24 +0000

Get real. Reeve was as much a contributor to the political landscape as Paul Wellstone and Strom Thurmond. Should Senators have not mentioned their deaths so as “not to shamelessly politicize” them?

By: James Ph.

James Ph. — Wed, 13 Oct 2004 03:24:58 +0000

Jay,

You have nothing to apologize for. Nothing at all. The Democrats have shamelessly politicized his death, even on the floor of the Senate. You just called them on it. The shame and disgrace is theirs, not yours.

By: Mark

Mark — Wed, 13 Oct 2004 00:42:37 +0000

Just for the record, it’s Reeve…not Reeves.

By: Wes Roth

Wes Roth — Wed, 13 Oct 2004 00:10:06 +0000

Edwards makes unprecedented campaign promises
Currently, it is the top story on Drudge, but the Times-Republican has the story where Vice Presidential Candidate John Edwards said this: “We will stop juvenile diabetes, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s and other debilitating diseases. America just lost a…

By: Joe

Joe — Tue, 12 Oct 2004 20:57:35 +0000

What really makes me sick is that Democrats say we need non-adult stem cell research because it provides “hope” to those like Reeves. There is only one thing worse than no hope, is false hope. To pray on a person’s disability with false hope is sick, wrong and disgusting.

By: truthado

truthado — Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:55:13 +0000

I gotta say that was poor taste, usually in most cases I agree with you jay, but I gotta say that this one was low

By: Mark

Mark — Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:11:42 +0000

Wow, you must be getting nervous if you’re reduced to mocking Christopher Reeve’s corpse before it’s even cold.

By: Nicholas MacDonald

Nicholas MacDonald — Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:44:30 +0000

Okay, screw Badnarik. If Kerry is a necromancer-king in disguise, he’s got my vote.