What Bush Said, And What He Should Have

I finally managed to catch a recording of Bush’s speech on Iraq in front of the Army War College, and while it was good, it lacked the kind of fire I was hoping for. Bush did a good job of showing that he had a plan for Iraq, and the violence of a few will not be allowed to derail that plan. He needed to do this, but he could have done it better. For instance, I would have invited some Iraqi bloggers to tell their story to the American people directly. The media won’t dare show a pro-American Iraqi, so Bush needed to do it.

Bush also needed to remind the world that the WMDs that provided his primary causus belli have indeed begun to be unearthed. He needed to show the world images of that sarin shell and tell the world that it represents only a small fraction of what Saddam failed to disclose to the UN as the world demanded of him. The absence of this crucial element is odd. Even if the shell represents a leftover from shortly before or after the Gulf War, it is crucial to point out that the four gallons of sarin found in Iraq would be enough to kill tens of thousands. His case was stronger than anyone thought – he needed to hit this point and hit it hard.

Bush needed to show us what is going right in Iraq, not just tell us. He needed to issue a real challenge to the media by doing an end-run around it and taking our case to the American people. He needed to tell us the stories the media didn’t. This is a speech that could have used the power of his September 20, 2001 speech or David Frum’s 2002 State of the Union. Bush isn’t the world’s best orator (far from it), but he can speak in a way that shows his force of character and his determination. He showed some of that, but we need to see more.

Granted, Bush sounded competent and in control, which he needed to do, but this is a speech that needed real fire. He did hit why we’re fighting, but I would have said something like this: In this war, we face the choice of fighting terrorism at home or fighting terrorism at its roots. Simply attacking al-Qaeda is not enough. Unless we change the conditions that spawned this form of terrorism, another will grow in its place. This simple line would have shown why a democratic Iraq is so important. Iraq is the keystone to this war, and if we can make Iraq even somewhat democratic we will be cutting off terrorism at the roots. Bush needs to tell the world that a democratic Iraq is what al-Qaeda fears most — because that is what will drain the swamp of terrorism.

On the other hand, the last few sections of the speech were brilliant, and I think there is a very important idea here:

Our actions, too, are guided by a vision. We believe that freedom can advance and change lives in the greater Middle East, as it has advanced and changed lives in Asia, and Latin America, and Eastern Europe, and Africa. We believe it is a tragedy of history that in the Middle East — which gave the world great gifts of law and science and faith — so many have been held back by lawless tyranny and fanaticism. We believe that when all Middle Eastern peoples are finally allowed to live and think and work and worship as free men and women, they will reclaim the greatness of their own heritage. And when that day comes, the bitterness and burning hatreds that feed terrorism will fade and die away. America and all the world will be safer when hope has returned to the Middle East.

These two visions — one of tyranny and murder, the other of liberty and life — clashed in Afghanistan. And thanks to brave U.S. and coalition forces and to Afghan patriots, the nightmare of the Taliban is over, and that nation is coming to life again. These two visions have now met in Iraq, and are contending for the future of that country. The failure of freedom would only mark the beginning of peril and violence. But, my fellow Americans, we will not fail. We will persevere, and defeat this enemy, and hold this hard-won ground for the realm of liberty.

The people of the Middle East need to hear this message, and we need to broadcast it 24 hours a day 7 days a week, every single day of the year. The problems of the Middle East aren’t caused by Israel, America, or any other external force. They are caused by the leaders who have embraced autocracy and corruption. The most important message we can send to the Middle East is that the path to strength is through democracy. The Arab culture is a culture based on honor and dishonor. We need to show that the Arab people can empower themselves. This is exactly what Abu Mus’ab al-Zarqawi fears the most. Once the Arab people realize that they have the power to unshackle themselves from the bonds of autocratic rule no power in heaven or earth can stop the inevitable rise of democracy.

Bush’s speech hit these points, but he needs to hit them constantly. He needs to take his case to the people and make it clear what we’re sacrificing blood and treasure to achieve. Despite all the anti-American voices that want to argue that this country is no better than the Ba’athists, the American people instinctively know that democracies don’t send terrorists out to destroy buildings or blow up subways. If there is one thing that approaches a truism in world politics it is that peace and democratization are innately linked.

Bush is only beginning to make his case. He needs to continue to make that case, and make that case with strength and determination. If Bush sticks to his gun, events will very likely decide in his failure. By the time of Election Day, the situation in Iraq will either be much better, in which case Bush will be reelected, or the US will blink and Iraq will spiral into chaos, in which case Kerry will turn Iraq into Vietnam politically even if the insurgents cannot militarily. We cannot afford this, and Bush needs to continue to remind the world why at every junction.

5 thoughts on “What Bush Said, And What He Should Have

  1. Jay:

    I presume you meant “decide in his favor”?

    You’re absolutely right – he needs to continue to make the case, and he’s done a poor enough job to-date that there wasn’t a message he could have delivered in 33 minutes to make up for the past lack of communications. But subsequent repetition, with updates to tactics and strategy as required, should do the trick.

    That is my hope, anyhow.

  2. “The people of the Middle East need to hear this message, and we need to broadcast it 24 hours a day 7 days a week, every single day of the year”

    This is what Bush’s strategy is all about: brainwashing!!! It worked on Jay, it can work on arabs as well!

    More seriously, don’t you think this is a problem when a politician needs to repeat the purpose of his actions everyday? And we’re not talking internal economic stuff here, but real, visible action. How is it possible that only 41% of american (app. 130 millions/6 billions humans) think that Bush is doing the right thing?

  3. It’s not brainwashing – it’s the truth. Unless you believe that keeping the Arabs enslaved to autocracy is better.

    The only way to prevent that corner of the world from being a cesspool is to end the autocracy that thrives there.

  4. “How is it possible that only 41% of american (app. 130 millions/6 billions humans) think that Bush is doing the right thing?”

    Good grief. If you are the average uninformed American citizen more concerned with what’s for dinner or the latest Michael Jackson update, being bombarded with the constant negative bias in mainstream media, which is your only source of information on world affairs, and the pollsters call you with their slanted questions like “Do you think the transition on June 30 to Iraqi self-governance will go smoothly?” (as if anyone thinks it will go off without a hitch), of course public perception is being eroded gradually but surely. Until the media gets honest, fair and balanced, it will continue.

  5. Vincent writes:”More seriously, don’t you think this is a problem when a politician needs to repeat the purpose of his actions everyday?”

    Response: Every leader constantly needs to remind those under his leadership of his purpose and vision. I guess you never heard of FDR’s fireside chats or of Lincoln’s Ghettysburg Address.

    Vincent writes:
    “How is it possible that only 41% of american (app. 130 millions/6 billions humans) think that Bush is doing the right thing?”

    Response: I guess you’ve polled the 6 billion inhabitants of planet earth, including those too young to know anything about current events, as well as those in 3rd World nations in too much poverty and lack to know very much about these issues either. And of course, there’s also those in countries with totalitarian rule who don’t have access to a free press, and only get what their dictators want them to receive in the way of news and information. There is also the number of people in countries who don’t perceive US interests as coinciding with their own, and so have opinions that reflect an agenda not in our interests.

    So this line about the whole world disagreeing with Bush is a bunch of crock. First, who can know what the whole world thinks? Second, since when did the whole world come to represent the best consensus for US policy? You’re living in this fantasyland where the world is just one big happy community whose views are so enlightened.

    I am sure if you polled the world during the 1930’s and asked them if they were in favor of confronting Hitler or appeasing him, most would have opted for appeasement.

    One problem with liberals is that they think of the rest of the world in the terms of a tourist brochure…just fun, exciting places with interesting people. They don’t take into account the harsh realities and selfish agendas that exist in other countries. For them, the only country with flaws is the US.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.